A writer must inhabit the physical and mental state of the character they are creating. He or she has to depict the description of the character’s motivations as opposed to a description of their traits. Those who don’t write or work on visual pieces are not accountable. They typically view each other as a sample rather than as a distinct individual and judge them according to their own experiences and social class.

Just as an ox cannot comprehend the life of a racehorse, so can a human being comprehend another human being. In how many encounters does the typical person engage? It implies that if he calls, the issue will be resolved; that people will rise from their seats to greet him; that they will ask permission before entering a room; address him as Sir; conduct transactions worth thousands of crores of takas annually; and that hundreds of thousands of people—almost everyone—will recognize his name. The parameters do not apply to every ordinary person. Therefore, it is required to develop a comparative picture using the data of 10–11 people who fit these parameters in order to comprehend the dynamic nature of a person’s life with such features. The lives of 10–11 ministers must be comprehended in order to evaluate a minister; otherwise, MPs or secretaries will not be understood. If not, a lot of false impressions will be spread.

There is no remedy, and the ordinary individual has been successfully committing this error for all of time.

In personality process mapping, the client is questioned about his goals and purpose at the start of the session. This is crucial since it falls under the institution’s ethical duty to guarantee that the patient will benefit from the BioPicLab session. Perceiving the person’s distinctive traits and patterns of behavior results in the creation of an impression of them, which acts as a rough sketch of their personality process mapping.